Skip to content
Home
Revitalize
Transform
Sustain
Lab
Profile
Menu
Home
Revitalize
Transform
Sustain
Lab
Profile
Rubric for Assessing Meeting Effectiveness
Resources & Tools
Sustain
Rubric for Assessing Meeting Effectiveness
Rubric for Assessing Meeting Effectiveness
Category 1: Psychological Safety
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
All participants feel safe sharing ideas openly; mistakes are consistently treated as learning opportunities.
Proficient (3):
Most participants feel safe sharing ideas; mistakes are occasionally treated as learning opportunities.
Developing (2):
Some participants feel hesitant to share ideas; mistakes are rarely framed as learning opportunities.
Needs Improvement (1):
Participants avoid sharing ideas due to fear of criticism or negative repercussions.
Category 2: Respectful Communication
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
Team members listen actively without interruptions, and feedback is consistently constructive and supportive.
Proficient (3):
Team members usually listen actively, with minimal interruptions; feedback is generally constructive.
Developing (2):
Interruptions occur frequently; feedback is occasionally dismissive or unhelpful.
Needs Improvement (1):
Conversations are marked by interruptions, dismissive tones, or lack of constructive feedback.
Category 3: Agenda and Time Management
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
Meetings consistently start and end on time; the agenda is clear, adhered to, and includes actionable outcomes.
Proficient (3):
Meetings generally start and end on time; the agenda is followed with minor deviations and includes key outcomes.
Developing (2):
Meetings frequently exceed the allocated time; the agenda lacks structure or actionable outcomes.
Needs Improvement (1):
Meetings consistently run over time, with no clear agenda or key outcomes.
Category 4: Collaborative Atmosphere
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
The team collaborates effectively, with diverse perspectives actively encouraged and valued.
Proficient (3):
Collaboration is evident, though some perspectives are less engaged or encouraged.
Developing (2):
Collaboration is limited, with certain voices dominating discussions.
Needs Improvement (1):
Collaboration is absent, and diverse perspectives are ignored or dismissed.
Category 5: Empathy and Understanding
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
Participants consistently acknowledge and validate others’ viewpoints and emotions, fostering consensus.
Proficient (3):
Participants generally acknowledge others’ viewpoints, with occasional missed opportunities for validation.
Developing (2):
Acknowledgment of others’ viewpoints occurs infrequently, and validation is rare.
Needs Improvement (1):
Participants dismiss or ignore others’ viewpoints and emotions.
Category 6: Constructive Conflict Resolution
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
Conflicts are consistently addressed with a focus on finding mutually beneficial solutions.
Proficient (3):
Conflicts are usually addressed constructively, though resolutions may not fully satisfy all parties.
Developing (2):
Conflicts are occasionally addressed, but solutions are superficial or incomplete.
Needs Improvement (1):
Conflicts are ignored or poorly managed, leading to ongoing tension.
Category 7: Positive Reinforcement
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
Achievements are consistently recognized and celebrated, fostering motivation and belonging.
Proficient (3):
Achievements are often recognized, though celebrations are occasional or uneven.
Developing (2):
Recognition of achievements is infrequent, with minimal encouragement provided.
Needs Improvement (1):
Achievements are ignored, and participants lack encouragement.
Category 8: Trust and Transparency
(Required)
Exemplary (4):
Open communication fosters trust, and decisions and rationales are shared openly.
Proficient (3):
Communication is generally transparent, though some decisions lack explanation.
Developing (2):
Transparency is inconsistent, and trust among team members is limited.
Needs Improvement (1):
Communication is opaque, and trust is lacking.
Total Score
Scoring and Interpretation
Exemplary (28–32 points):
Highly effective meetings that foster a positive, supportive, and productive environment.
Proficient (20–27 points):
Generally effective meetings with room for improvement in specific areas.
Developing (12–19 points):
Meetings require targeted improvements to enhance productivity and team dynamics.
Needs Improvement (8–11 points):
Meetings are ineffective and require significant changes to achieve goals.
Previous Lesson
Previous Topic
Back to Lesson
Next Topic
